|Table of Contents|

Analysis on double-row anti-slide piles of slope in Yanan(PDF)

长安大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2011年02期
Page:
63-67
Research Field:
Publishing date:
2011-04-30

Info

Title:
Analysis on double-row anti-slide piles of slope in Yanan
Author(s):
LIU Ming1 HUANG Hua12 HAN Bing3 LIU Bo-quan1
1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Old Bridge Detection and Reinforcement Technology of Ministry of Transportation, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 3. China Northwest Building Design & Research Institute, Xi'an 710003, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
geotechnical engineering loess slope double-row piles retaining structure
PACS:
P642.131
DOI:
-
Abstract:
During the urbanization process of Yanan, there are high building slopes retained with double-row anti-slide piles in loess hilly regions. The mechanism of the double-row anti-slide piles were analyzed with the help of Marc program. The influencing factors were analyzed, which included the pile-soil interaction, the pile's rigidity, the crossbeam's rigidity, the length of the double-row piles and their distance. The results show that with the reduce of the soil's strength, the part of the front pile which has contact with the soil directly extends to the top of the pile, but the part of the back pile which has contact with the soil directly shrinks from the top of the pile. The tensile stresses of the upper half of the front pile are bigger. Especially on the root of the slope the tensile stresses reach the biggest. But the biggest tensile stresses of the back pile lie on the 14 m to 15 m from its top. The ratio of the biggest tensile stresses of the front pile and the back pile is about 3/2. When calculating the capability, the bending moment can be proportional distributed with 3/2. The height of the tie beam on the pile top is about 60% to 70% of the pile's diameter. The distance between the front pile with the back pile is about 1.5 to 2 times of the pile's diameter. 14 figs, 5 refs.

References:

[1] 王根龙,张军慧,晏长根.岩质边坡六面体滑楔的三维塑性极限分析研究[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版,2009,29(3):77-80. WANG Gen-long,ZHANG Jun-hui,YAN Chang-gen.3D plasticity limit analysis of hexahedral sliding wedge for rock slope[J].Journal of Chang'an University:Natural Science Edition,2009,29(3):77-80.
[2]王 佳,白晓红,王 梅,等.黄土湿陷性试验研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(3):41-44. WANG Jia,BAI Xiao-hong,WANG Mei,et al.Study of collapsibility test on loess[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2006,23(3):41-44.
[3]蒋斌松,蔡美峰,吕爱钟.边坡稳定性的解析计算[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(16):2726-2729. JIANG Bin-song,CAI Mei-feng,LU Ai-zhong.Analytical calculation of slope stability[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(16):2726-2729.
[4]赵之胜.高等级公路黄土高边坡稳定性研究[R].西安:陕西省公路勘察设计院,2000.
[5]高德彬,倪万魁,郭社锋.基于范例推理的黄土路堑高边坡稳定性预测研究[J].工程地质学报,2007,15(5):635-638. GAO De-bin,NI Wan-kui,GUO She-feng.Forecast model of stability of highway loess cutting-slopes based on case-based reasoning[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2007,15(5):635-638.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2011-04-30