|Table of Contents|

Uplift mode of shield tunnel caused by seismic liquefaction in liquefiable soil(PDF)

长安大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2024年1期
Page:
80-90
Research Field:
桥梁与隧道工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Uplift mode of shield tunnel caused by seismic liquefaction in liquefiable soil
Author(s):
ZHONG Xiao-chun1;  YI Bin-bin1;  ZHU Wei-bin2;  ZHU Si-ran3;  LUO Shu-yi3;  WANG Qi1
(1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, China; 2. Guangzhou Metro Group Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510220, Guangdong, China; 3. Guangzhou Mass Transit Engineering Consultant Co. Ltd., Guangzhou 510030, Guangdong, China)
Keywords:
tunnel engineering;  shield tunnel;  seismic liquefaction;  tunnel uplifting;  uplift mode;  numerical simulation
PACS:
U456
DOI:
10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.01.008
Abstract:
Aiming at the uplifting behavior of shield tunnel in liquefiable soil strata during earthquake, to explore the uplifting conditions, the uplift mode was discussed by combining finite difference model with shaking table test. Based on the finite difference software FLAC3D, an analysis model of seismic dynamic liquefaction was established. The Finn liquefaction constitutive model which can reflect the increase of pore pressure under seismic load was adopted. The reliability of the analysis model was verified by shaking table test with the excess pore pressure ratio as the evaluation index. Different combination cases were set for the numerical model calculation. The influence of standard penetration test-blow counts(SPT-blow counts)and tunnel buried depth on the tunnel uplift was analyzed. The uplift mode of tunnel caused by earthquake was further explored. The relationship curves of the two were obtained respectively. Through force analysis and formula derivation, the critical excess pore pressure ratio of tunnel uplifting was obtained, which was mutually confirmed with the numerical calculation results. The method of judging tunnel uplifting caused by seismic liquefaction was obtained. The results show that the smaller SPT-blow counts and tunnel depth are, the larger the uplift is. The uplift is divided into two parts, one caused by seismic shear deformation and the other by soil liquefaction. The former is related to the buried depth of the tunnel, and the latter is influenced by the soil condition(SPT-blow counts). The critical condition of tunnel uplifting caused by seismic liquefaction is that the buoyancy of the tunnel needs to be greater than the sum of the self-weight of the tunnel and the effective pressure of the overlying soil, which can be judged by the relationship between SPT-blow counts or the excess pore pressure ratio and the buried depth of the tunnel. For example, for a shield tunnel with diameter of 6.2 m, buried depth of 10 m and groundwater level of 1 m under the fortification intensity of 7 degree, the uplift caused by soil liquefaction occurs when SPT-blow counts is less than 7 or the excess pore pressure ratio is greater than 0.432. This method can provide reference for tunnel aseismic design.7 tabs, 16 figs, 26 refs.

References:

[1] 胡记磊.基于贝叶斯网络的地震液化风险分析模型研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016.
HU Ji-lei.Study on the risk analysis model of seismic liquefaction based on Bayesian network[D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology,2016.
[2]杜修力,李 洋,许成顺,等.1995年日本阪神地震大开地铁车站震害原因及成灾机理分析研究进展[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(2):223-236.
DU Xiu-li,LI Yang,XU Cheng-shun,et al.Review on damage causes and disaster mechanism of Daikai Subway Station during 1995 Osaka-Kobe Earthquake[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2018,40(2):223-236.
[3]王 刚,张建民,魏 星.可液化土层中地下车站的地震反应分析[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(10):1623-1627.
WANG Gang,ZHANG Jian-min,WEI Xing.Seismic response analysis of a subway station in liquefiable soil[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2011,33(10):1623-1627.
[4]郑 刚,杨鹏博,周海祚,等.可液化地层中矩形隧道的上浮响应分析[J].土木工程学报,2019,52(增1):257-264.
ZHENG Gang,YANG Peng-bo,ZHOU Hai-zuo,et al.The uplift response of rectangular tunnel in liquefiable soil[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2019,52(S1):257-264.
[5]AZADI M,MIR MOHAMMAD H S M.The uplifting behavior of shallow tunnels within the liquefiable soils under cyclic loadings[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2010,25(2):158-167.
[6]张艳美,吴文涛,李国勋,等.液化场地区间隧道地震响应分析[J].地震工程学报,2021,43(2):412-420.
ZHANG Yan-mei,WU Wen-tao,LI Guo-xun,et al.Seismic response analysis of running tunnels in liquefiable site[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2021,43(2):412-420.
[7]朱 彤,王 睿,张建民.盾构隧道在可液化场地中的地震响应分析[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(增1):57-60.
ZHU Tong,WANG Rui,ZHANG Jian-min.Seismic response analysis of shield tunnels in liquefiable soils[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,41(S1):57-60.
[8]周 军,伍伟林,胡瑞青.可液化砂土地层盾构隧道地震响应研究[J].铁道工程学报,2017,34(12):83-88.
ZHOU Jun,WU Wei-lin,HU Rui-qing.Research on the seismic responses for shield tunnel in liquefiable soil[J].Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2017,34(12):83-88.
[9]李 强,甘鹏路,钟小春.盾构隧道管片壁后注浆厚度对隧道抗浮影响研究[J].现代隧道技术,2019,56(6):27-35.
LI Qiang,GAN Peng-lu,ZHONG Xiao-chun.Study on effect of backfilling grouting thickness on anti-floating of the shield tunnel[J].Modern Tunnelling Technology,2019,56(6):27-35.
[10]蒋清国.液化地层下地铁工程抗地震液化措施研究[J].震灾防御技术,2015,10(1):95-107.
JIANG Qing-guo.Anti-liquefaction measures for subway engineering in liquefiable soil layers[J].Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,2015,10(1):95-107.
[11]段亚刚.大范围地震液化条件下地下结构设计研究[J].铁道工程学报,2014,31(10):49-53.
DUAN Ya-gang.Research on the design of underground structure in large range of sand seismic liquefaction conditions[J].Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2014,31(10):49-53.
[12]姜 曦.大型水下盾构隧道地震响应分析及抗震措施研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2012.
JIANG Xi.Analysis on seismic response and research on aseismatic construction of a great diameter underwater shield tunnel[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2012.
[13]李艺林,庞 明,李 铮,等.液化地层盾构隧道碎石桩加固地震响应分析[J].公路,2022,67(9):432-438.
LI Yi-lin,PANG Ming,LI Zheng,et al.Seismic response analysis of gravel pile reinforcement for shield tunnels in liquefied stratum[J].Highway,2022,67(9):432-438.
[14]WU W F,GE S P,YUAN Y,et al.Seismic response of subway station in soft soil:Shaking table testing versus numerical analysis[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2020,100:103389.
[15]PAOLUCCI R,SHIRATO M,YILMAZ M T.Seismic behaviour of shallow foundations:Shaking table experiments vs numerical modelling[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,2008,37(4):577-595.
[16]宁茂权,肖明清,晋学辉,等.盾构隧道中细砂液化特性的小型振动台试验研究[J].现代隧道技术,2021,58(4):178-184.
NING Mao-quan,XIAO Ming-qing,JIN Xue-hui,et al.Study on liquefaction characteristics of medium-fine sands in shield tunnelling with small-size shaking table test[J].Modern Tunnelling Technology,2021,58(4):178-184.
[17]彭加强,钟小春,王 奇,等.盾构隧道穿越液化地基上浮振动台试验分析[J].隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(增2):60-67.
PENG Jia-qiang,ZHONG Xiao-chun,WANG Qi,et al.Analysis on shaking table experiment for shield tunnel through liquefied foundation[J].Tunnel Construction,2018,38(S2):60-67.
[18]郭志明,李思明,袁 勇,等.土-岩变化地层盾构隧道纵向地震作用试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2021,54(增1):58-64.
GUO Zhi-ming,LI Si-ming,YUAN Yong,et al.Experimental investigation of shield-driven tunnel crossing soil-rock interface under longitudinal excitations[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2021,54(S1):58-64.
[19]耿 萍,何 川,张 景,等.盾构隧道地震响应试验研究[J].隧道与地下工程灾害防治,2020,2(2):47-57.
GENG Ping,HE Chuan,ZHANG Jing,et al.Experimental study on seismic response of shield tunnel[J].Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering,2020,2(2):47-57.
[20]安军海,陶连金,蒋录珍.盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验[J].岩土力学,2022,43(5):1277-1288.
AN Jun-hai,TAO Lian-jin,JIANG Lu-zhen.A shaking table-based experimental study on seismic response of a shield-enlarge-dig type subway station structure[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2022,43(5):1277-1288.
[21]MARTIN G R,FINN W D L,SEED H B.Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading[J].Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division,1975,101(5):423-438.
[22]BYRNE M P.A cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore pressure model for sand[C]//ICRAGD.Proceedings of Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Dynamics.St Louls:University of Missouri-Rolla,1991:47-55.
[23]王根龙,林 玮,蔡晓光.基于Finn本构模型的饱和砂土地震液化分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2010,30(3):178-184.
WANG Gen-long,LIN Wei,CAI Xiao-guang.Seismic liquefaction analysis of saturated sand soil based on Finn constitutive model[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2010,30(3):178-184.
[24]于伦超,钟小春,张露露.局部液化地层范围及埋深对隧道地震上浮的影响研究[J].河北工程大学学报(自然科学版),2020,37(4):57-62,77.
YU Lun-chao,ZHONG Xiao-chun,ZHANG Lu-lu.Study on the influence of the local liquefaction formation range and burial depth on the seismic floating displacement of tunnel[J].Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Natural Science Edition),2020,37(4):57-62,77.
[25]陈国兴,庄海洋,杜修力,等.土-地铁隧道动力相互作用的大型振动台试验:试验结果分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(1):164-170.
CHEN Guo-xing,ZHUANG Hai-yang,DU Xiu-li,et al.A large-scale shaking table test for dynamic soil-metro tunnel interaction:Analysis of test results[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2007,27(1):164-170.
[26]史世波,陈必光,舒 恒,等.水下盾构隧道地震液化数值分析[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(4):85-89.
SHI Shi-bo,CHEN Bi-guang,SHU Heng,et al.Numerical analysis of seismic liquefaction of underwater shield tunnel[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2020,37(4):85-89.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-01-10