|Table of Contents|

Mechanism of day-to-day route choice under different ATIS market penetration(PDF)

长安大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2022年4期
Page:
118-126
Research Field:
交通工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Mechanism of day-to-day route choice under different ATIS market penetration
Author(s):
LIU Shi-xu1;  WANG Zhi-yu2;  YAN Hao3;  ZHU Jian-Chao1;  WANG Shu-yu1
(1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China; 2. Fuzhou Rail Transit Design Institute Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350004, Fujian, China; 3. Shanxi Technology and Business College, Taiyuan 030036, Shanxi, China)
Keywords:
traffic engineering;  route choice mechanism;  cluster analysis;  ATIS market penetration;  behavioral experiment
PACS:
U491
DOI:
10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2022.04.012
Abstract:
To explore the mechanism of travelers' day-to-day route choice under different advanced traveler information systems(ATIS)market share, with the help of behavioral experiment, five representative day-to-day route-choice behavior experiments were designed for travelers under different ATIS market penetration(0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%). According to the four possible scenarios of constructed route choice decision variables, they were recorded as four characteristic variables and the travelers were classified. The K-Means++ clustering model was used to analyze the route choice mechanism. The results show that with the increase of experimental rounds, the historical travel times of three routes of the Braess network fluctuate continuously. With the increase of ATIS market penetration, the travel times gradually tend to user equilibrium and the number of route switching fluctuates through the whole experiment. When the ATIS market penetration is 0%, the number of route switching is significantly higher than that of other ATIS market penetration(25%, 50%, 75%, 100%). When the network has a certain ATIS market penetration, the number of route switching is only a small difference between the ATIS market penetration of 50% and 75%. Four kinds of route choice patterns are found in traveler's day-to-day route choice, direct response, reverse response, always maintaining route choice, and always switching route choice. Under different ATIS market penetration, the route choice modes are not the same. With the increase of ATIS market penetration, the difference degree of route choice mode between groups of travelers gradually increases, and the individual heterogeneity of travelers is also gradually increasing. The sensitivity of travelers to the change of travel time under the condition of complete network information is worse than that under the condition of incomplete network information.5 tabs, 3 figs, 27 refs.

References:

[1] IIDA Y,AKIYAMA T,UCHIDA T.Experimental analysis of dynamic route choice behavior[J].Transportation Research Part B,1992,26(1):17-32.
[2]IIDA Y,UNO N,YAMADA T.Experimental analysis approach to analyze dynamic route choice behavior of driver with travel time information[C]//IEEE.Proceedings of VNIS'94—1994 Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference.NewYok:IEEE,1994:377-382.
[3]LIU Y H,MAHMASSANI H S.Dynamic aspects of commuter decisions under advanced traveler information systems:Modeling framework and experimental results[J].Transportation Research Record,1998(1645):111-119.
[4]CLARKE D D,WARD P,BARTLE C,et al. An analysis of effects of trend information upon route choice behaviour by in-laboratory experiment[J]. International Journal of ITS Research,2008,6(1):57-65.
[5]BEN-ELIA E,EREV I,SHIFTAN Y.The combined effect of information and experience on drivers' route-choice behavior[J].Transportation,2008,35(2):165-177.
[6]BEN-ELIA E,DI PACE R,BIFULCO G N,et al.The impact of travel information's accuracy on route-choice[J].Transportation Research Part C,2013,26:146-159.
[7]MOGHADDAM Z R,JEIHANI M,PEETA S,et al.Comprehending the roles of traveler perception of travel time reliability on route choice behavior[J].Travel Behaviour and Society,2019,16:13-22.
[8]刘天亮,张 冲,王天歌,等.朋友圈信息交互对个体出行决策行为的影响研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2013,13(6):86-93.
LIU Tian-liang,ZHANG Chong,WANG Tian-ge,et al.Effects of friends' information interaction on travel decisions[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2013,13(6):86-93.
[9]ZHANG C,LIU T L,HUANG H J,et al.A cumulative prospect theory approach to commuters' day-to-day route-choice modeling with friends' travel information[J].Transportation Research Part C,2018,86:527-548.
[10]SAEDI R,KHADEMI N.Travel time cognition:Exploring the impacts of travel information provision strategies[J].Travel Behaviour and Society,2019,14:92-106.
[11]BOGERS E A I,VITI F,HOOGENDOORN S P.Joint modeling of advanced travel information service,habit,and learning impacts on route choice by laboratory simulator experiments[J].Transportation Research Record,2005(1926):189-197.
[12]WANG J H,RAKHA H.Empirical study of effect of dynamic travel time information on driver route choice behavior[J].Sensors,2020,20(11):3257.
[13]SHIFTAN Y,BEKHOR S,ALBERT G.Route choice behaviour with pre-trip travel time information[J].IET Intelligent Transport Systems,2011,5(3):183-189.
[14]LU X,GAO S,BEN-ELIA E.Information impacts on route choice and learning behavior in a congested network[J].Transportation Research Record,2011(2243):89-98.
[15]LU X,GAO S,BEN-ELIA E,et al.Travelers' day-to-day route choice behavior with real-time information in a congested risky network[J].Mathematical Population Studies,2014,21(4):205-219.
[16]MAK V,GISCHES E J,RAPOPORT A.Route vs.segment:An experiment on real-time travel information in congestible networks[J].Production and Operations Management,2015,24(6):947-960.
[17]YU X L,GAO S.Learning routing policies in a disrupted,congestible network with real-time information:An experimental approach[J].Transportation Research Part C,2019,106:205-219.
[18]尹子坤,关宏志,李 涛.逐日路径演化中出行者信息偏好的实验分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2017,17(4):234-240.
YIN Zi-kun,GUAN Hong-zhi,LI Tao.Experimental analysis of diver's information preference under day-to-day traffic dynamics[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2017,17(4):234-240.
[19]RAPOPORT A,MAK V,ZWICK R.Navigating congested networks with variable demand:Experimental evidence[J].Journal of Economic Psychology,2006,27(5):648-666.
[20]SELTEN R,SCHRECKENBERG M,PITZ T,et al.Experimental investigation of day-to-day route choice behaviour[M]//SCHRECKENBERG M,SELTEN R.Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks.Heidelberg:Springer,2003:325-330.
[21]SELTEN R,CHMURA T,PITZ T,et al.Commuters route choice behaviour[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2007,58(2):394-406.
[22]CHMURA T,PITZ T,费方域.少数派博弈:实验研究与模拟[J].系统管理学报,2007,16(6):585-589.
[DW]CHMURA T,PITZ T,FEI Fang-yu.The minority game:Experiments and simulations[J].Journal of Systems & Management,2007,16(6):585-589.
[23][KG-*5]MENEGUZZER C.Contrarians do better:Testing participants' response to information in a simulated day-to-day route choice experiment[J].Travel Behaviour and Society,2019,15:146-156.
[24]QI H,MA S F,JIA N,et al.Individual response modes to pre-trip information in congestible networks:Laboratory experiment[J].Transportmetrica A Transport Science,2019,15(2):376-395.
[25]刘诗序,王智煜,关宏志,等.不同信息下的逐日路径选择行为实验与模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2020,20(6):106-113,144.
LIU Shi-xu,WANG Zhi-yu,GUAN Hong-zhi,et al.Experiment and model of day-to-day route-choice behavior under different information[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2020,20(6):106-113,144.
[26]吴进宝.K-means算法研究综述[J].电子技术与软件工程,2014(18):207.
WU Jin-bao. A review of K-means algorithm[J].Electronic Technology & Software Engineering,2014(18):207.
[27]ROUSSEEUW P J.Silhouettes:A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis[J].Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,1987,20:53-65.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-07-20