[1]陈 波,赵春剑.运输能力约束条件下的旅客出行选择Logit模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(2):115-122.[doi:10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.02.011]
 CHEN Bo,ZHAO Chun-jian.Logit model for travel mode choice with traffic capacity constraints[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2024,44(2):115-122.[doi:10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.02.011]
点击复制

运输能力约束条件下的旅客出行选择Logit模型()
分享到:

长安大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2024年2期
页码:
115-122
栏目:
交通工程
出版日期:
2024-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Logit model for travel mode choice with traffic capacity constraints
文章编号:
1671-8879(2024)02-0115-08
作者:
陈 波赵春剑
(长安大学 运输工程学院,陕西 西安 710064)
Author(s):
CHEN Bo ZHAO Chun-jian
(College of Transportation Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China)
关键词:
交通工程 运输通道 Logit模型 运输能力 惩罚因子
Keywords:
traffic engineering transportation corridor Logit model traffic capacity penalty factor
分类号:
U491.14
DOI:
10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.02.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了提升旅客运输通道交通需求预测的准确性,针对现有旅客出行选择模型未充分考虑交通方式运输能力约束的不足,在深入分析旅客出行选择机理和运输能力约束机制的基础上,通过经典多项Logit(MNL)模型效用函数的优化设计,引入惩罚因子表征运输能力对旅客出行选择的约束,建立运输能力约束条件下的旅客出行选择Logit模型(约束MNL模型),并设计模型求解算法预测各交通方式的分担率。以西宝(西安—宝鸡)客运通道为对象进行实例分析,通过2种MNL模型预测结果的对比分析,验证约束MNL模型预测性能的优越性。研究结果表明:在旅客出行选择过程中,交通方式运输能力的约束具有普遍性,是有效交通需求预测不可忽略的重要因素,约束MNL模型考虑了运输能力对旅客出行选择的影响,更符合旅客出行选择的决策过程,从机理上为提升交通需求预测的准确性提供了可靠保障; 惩罚因子反映了运输能力约束对旅客出行选择的影响,代表了运输能力约束条件下运输服务质量的下降和旅客出行效用的损失; 通过惩罚因子的合理赋值,建立旅客出行选择概率重新分配机制,能有效模拟旅客出行方式的转换、控制旅客出行选择的概率; 与传统MNL模型相比,约束MNL模型表现出了更优异的预测性能,能始终将预测结果控制在由运输能力决定的分担率上限范围内,预测结果符合实际、科学有效,能够为旅客运输通道的网络布局优化、运输组织设计等提供可靠数据支持。
Abstract:
In order to improve the accuracy of traffic demand forecasting for passenger transportcorridors, addressing the shortcoming that the traffic capacity constraints are not adequatelyconsidered in the traditional passengers' mode choice models, the mechanism of passengers'mode choice and constraints from traffic capacity were deeply analyzed, and a penaltyfactor was introduced through the utility function optimization of the classical MNL model, tocharacterize the constraints of traffic capacity on passengers' mode choice, a constrainedMNL model was proposed, and the corresponding algorithm was designed to forecast the share ofeach transportation mode. The XiBao(Xi'an to Baoji)passenger corridor was taken as anexample to verify the superior performance of the constrained MNL model by comparativeanalyzing the forecasting results of the two models. The results show that in the process ofpassengers' mode choice, the constraints of traffic capacity are universal, which is an importantfactor that cannot be ignored for effective traffic demand forecasting, the constrained MNL modeltakes into account the impact of traffic capacity on passengers' mode choice, which is more in linewith the decision-making process of passengers' mode choice, and provides a reliable guaranteefor improving the accuracy of traffic demand forecasting from the mechanism. The penaltyfactor reflects the impact of traffic capacity constraints on passengers' mode choice, and representsthe decline in transportation service quality and the loss of passengers' utility. Through thereasonable assignment of the penalty factor, it can redistribute the passengers' choice probability,effectively simulate the shift of passengers' mode choice and control the probability ofpassengers' mode choice. Compare with the traditional MNL model, the constrained MNLmodel shows better performance, which can always control the forecasting results within theupper limit of the share determined by the traffic capacity, and the results are realistic, scientificand effective, which can provide reliable data support for the optimization of the network layoutand the design of the transportation organization.2 tabs, 6 figs, 30 refs.

参考文献/References:

[1] CIPRIANI E,GEMMA A,MANNINI L,et al.Traffic demand estimation using path information from Bluetoothdata[J].Transportation Research Part C,2021,133:103443.
[2]王 灿,王 德,朱 玮,等.离散选择模型研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(10):1275-1287.
WANG Can,WANG De,ZHU Wei,et al.Research progress of discrete choice models[J].Progress inGeography,2015,34(10):1275-1287.
[3]SIFRINGER B,LURKIN V,ALAHI A.Enhancing discrete choice models with representation learning[J].Transportation Research Part B,2020,140:236-261.
[4]HU H,XU J,SHEN Q,et al.Travel mode choices in small cities of China:A case study of Changting[J].Transportation Research Part D,2018,59:361-374.
[5]程 谦,卢万胜,曲思源,等.基于多项Logit模型的高速铁路客流分配实证研究[J].铁道运输与经济,2020,42(7):60-66.
CHENG Qian,LU Wan-sheng,QU Si-yuan,et al.An empirical study of passenger flow distribution based on multinomial Logit model[J].Railway Transport and Economy,2020,42(7):60-66.
[6]TANG X Y,WANG D H,SUN Y L,et al.Choice behavior of tourism destination and travel mode:A case study of local residents in Hangzhou,China[J].Journal of Transport Geography,2020,89:102895.
[7]刘 向,董德存,王 宁,等.基于Nested Logit的电动汽车分时租赁选择行为分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(1):47-55.
LIU Xiang,DONG De-cun,WANG Ning,et al.Analysis of choices of electric car sharing based on Nested Logit model[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2019,47(1):47-55.
[8]马书红,周烨超,张 艳.基于NL-累计前景理论的出行方式选择预测模型研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2019,19(4):135-142.
MA Shu-hong,ZHOU Ye-chao,ZHANG Yan.Travel mode choice forecasting based on Nested Logit-cumulativeprospect theory model[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and InformationTechnology,2019,19(4):135-142.
[9]刘 锴,王 静,王江波,等.考虑个体偏好异质性的定制公交选择行为[J/OL].中国公路学报:1-14[2023-12-26].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1313.U.20230907.1145.006.html.
LIU Kai,WANG Jing,WANG Jiang-bo,et al.Study on customized bus choice behavior considering individual preferenceheterogeneity[J/OL].China Journal of Highway and Transport:1-14[2023-12-26].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1313.U.20230907.1145.006.html.
[10]AHMED U,ROORDA M J.Modelling carrier type and vehicle type choice of small and medium size firms[J].Transportation Research Part E,2022,160:102655.
[11]CAN V V.Estimation of travel mode choice for domestic tourists to Nha Trang using the multinomial probitmode[J].Transportation Research Part A,2013,49:149-159.
[12]于 跃,李雷鸣.从出租车到网约车的乘客出行方式选择行为演化博弈分析[J].软科学,2019,33(8):126-132.
YU Yue,LI Lei-ming.Evolutionary game analysis on travel mode selecting behavior of passengers from taxi to ridesharing[J].Soft Science,2019,33(8):126-132.
[13]LARS B,AMEN P V,HELBICH M.Elderly travel frequencies and transport mode choices in Greater Rotterdam,the Netherlands[J].Transportation,2016,44:1-22.
[14]GRAELLS G E,CARO D,PARRA D.Inferring modes of transportation using mobile phone data[J].EPJ Data Science,2018,7(1):49.
[15]WANG Z Z,HE S Y,LEUNG Y.Applying mobile phone data to travel behaviour research:A literature review[J].Travel Behaviour and Society,2018,11:141-155.
[16]钟舒琦,邓如丰,邓红平,等.基于兴趣点与导航数据的手机信令数据出行方式识别[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2020,59(3):87-96.
ZHONG Shu-qi,DENG Ru-feng,DENG Hong-ping,et al.Recognition of traffic mode of mobile phone data based on the combination of point of interest data and navigation data[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni,2020,59(3):87-96.
[17]杜亚朋,雒江涛,程克非,等.基于手机信令和导航数据的出行方式识别方法[J].计算机应用研究,2018,35(8):2311-2314.
DU Ya-peng,LUO Jiang-tao,CHENG Ke-fei,et al.Recognition of urban travel method based on cell phonesignaling and navigation map data[J].Application Research of Computers,2018,35(8):2311-2314.
[18]宋永朝,杨 培.基于多源数据的通勤高峰期出行方式分担率预测方法研究[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2018,37(5):84-91.
SONG Yong-chao,YANG Pei.Prediction method of travel mode share rate in commuting peak period based onmulti-source data[J].Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Natural Science),2018,37(5):84-91.
[19]MINAL S,RAVI S C,MADHU E.Development of neuro-fuzzy based multimodal mode choice model forcommuter in Delhi[J].IET Intelligent Transport Systems,2018,13(2):1-9.
[20]刘春禹,罗 霞.出行方式选择:机器学习方法与多项Logit模型比较研究[J].综合运输,2018,40(8):57-63.
LIU Chun-yu,LUO Xia.Travel mode choice:A comparison of machine learning and multinomial Logit model[J].China Transportation Review,2018,40(8):57-63.
[21]GREENE W H,HENSHER D A.Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial Logit model[J].Applied Economics,2013,45(14):1897-1902.
[22]BHAT C R,SIDHARTHAN R.A simulation evaluation of the maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood(MACML)estimator for mixed multinomial probit models[J].Transportation Research Part B,2011,45(7):940-953.
[23]廖 勇.运输通道内客运方式的替代性模型研究[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(14):5969-5974.
LIAO Yong.Research on the substitutability model between passenger transport modes in transportation corridor[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(14):5969-5974.
[24]周正祥,毕继芳.长江中游城市群综合交通运输体系优化研究[J].中国软科学,2019(8):66-76.
ZHOU Zheng-xiang,BI Ji-fang.Study on optimization of comprehensive transportation system of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J].China Soft Science,2019,8:66-76.
[25]薛艳杰,王 振.长三角城市群协同发展研究[J].社会科学,2016(5):50-58.
XUE Yan-jie,WANG Zhen.Research on the collaborative development of urban agglomeration in Yangtze River Delta[J].Journal of Social Sciences,2016(5):50-58.
[26]RAHMAN M L,BAKER D.Modelling induced mode switch behaviour in Bangladesh:A multinomial logistic regression approach[J].Transport Policy,2018,71:81-91.
[27]李连成.交通强国的内涵及评价指标体系[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2020,19(2):12-19.
LI Lian-cheng.Connotation and evaluation index system for building China's strength in transportation[J].Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition),2020,19(2):12-19.
[28]孙启鹏,朱 磊,陈 波.基于动态广义费用的客运通道交通方式选择Logit模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2013,13(4):15-22.
SUN Qi-peng,ZHU Lei,CHEN Bo.A dynamic generalized cost based Logit model for passenger corridors[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2013,13(4):15-22.
[29]SINGH M,CHEN G W,GOPALAKRISHNAN R,et al.Exploration of the contributing factors to the walking and biking travel frequency using multi-level joint models with endogeneity[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering(English Edition),2022,9(6):1044-1054.
[30]张 陆.城市群客运交通结构优化配置研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2011.
ZHANG Lu.Study on urban agglomeration of optimal allocation of passenger traffic[D].Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,2011.

相似文献/References:

[1]王建伟,李娉,高洁,等.中国交通运输碳减排区域划分[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[2]李曙光,周庆华.具有破坏排队的离散时间动态网络装载算法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[3]凌海兰,郗恩崇.基于随机波动条件的公交客运量预测模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[4]田娥,肖庆,陆小佳,等.安全驾驶的横向安全预警报警阈值的确定[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[5]侯贻栋,赵炜华,魏 朗,等.驾驶人空间距离判识规律心理学分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):86.
 HOU Yi-dong,ZHAO Wei-hua,WEI Lang,et al.Analysis on psychology in cognitive distance about drivers[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):86.
[6]赵跃峰,张生瑞,魏 华.隧道群路段运行速度特性分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):67.
 ZHAO Yue-feng,ZHANG Sheng-rui,WEI hua.Operating speed characteristics of tunnel group section[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):67.
[7]林 杉,许宏科,刘占文.一种高速公路隧道交通流元胞自动机模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):73.
 LIN Shan,XU Hong-ke,LIU Zhan-wen.One cellular automaton traffic flow model for expressway tunnel[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):73.
[8]刘俊德,徐 兵,梁永东,等.交通事故下高速公路行车安全评估[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):78.
 LIU Jun-de,XU bing,LIANG Yong-dong,et al.Traffic safety assessment of expressway in the accident[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):78.
[9]芮海田,吴群琪,赵跃峰,等.公路建设对区域经济发展的影响分析——以陕西省为例[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):83.
 RUI Hai-tian,WU Qun-qi,ZHAO Yue-feng,et al.Influence of highway construction on regional economy development——taking Shaanxi as an example[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):83.
[10]彭 辉,续宗芳,韩永启,等.城市群城际运输结构配置客流分担率模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(02):91.
 PENG Hui,XU Zong-fang,HAN Yong-qi,et al.Sharing ratios model of passenger flows in intercity transportation structure configuration among urban agglomeration[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):91.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-09-29
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学基金项目(20YJC790007); 陕西省社会科学基金项目(2019D013); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(300102341677); 陕西省自然科学基金项目(2022JM-426)
作者简介:陈 波(1988-),男,陕西安康人,讲师,工学博士,E-mail:chb@chd.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-01