[1]徐志刚,魏璐颖,刘志广,等.基于多国实测数据的跟驰模型对比[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(2):89-100.[doi:10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.02.009]
　XU Zhi-gang,WEI Lu-ying,LIU Zhi-guang,et al.Contrastive of car-following model based on multinational empirical data[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2024,44(2):89-100.[doi:10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.02.009]
点击复制

基于多国实测数据的跟驰模型对比()
分享到：

长安大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2024年2期
页码:
89-100
栏目:
交通工程
出版日期:
2024-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Contrastive of car-following model based on multinational empirical data
文章编号:
1671-8879(2024)02-0089-12
作者:
徐志刚1; 魏璐颖1; 刘志广1; 刘张琦2; 秦孔建3
(1. 长安大学 信息工程学院,陕西 西安 710064; 2. 陕西汽车控股集团有限公司,陕西 西安 710299; 3. 中汽科技(北京)有限公司,北京 100176)
Author(s):
XU Zhi-gang1;  WEI Lu-ying1;  LIU Zhi-guang1;  LIU Zhang-qi2;  QIN Kong-jian3
(1. School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. Shaanxi Automobile Holding Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710299, Shaanxi, China; 3. Beijing CATARC Auto Test Center Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China)
关键词:
交通工程;  微观交通流;  跟驰模型;  S3模型;  HighD数据集;  模拟退火法
Keywords:
traffic engineering;  microscopic traffic flow;  car following model;  S3 model;  HighD dataset;  simulated annealing method
分类号:
U491.112
DOI:
10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2024.02.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了更精确描述车辆跟驰(CF)行为,并研究不同国家跟驰行为数据对跟驰标定模拟的影响,以及各跟驰模型对跟驰行为模拟的精确程度,选取中国西安市南二环某路段交通流CHD数据集、美国NGSIM数据集以及德国HighD数据集,针对Gazis-Herman-Rothery(GHR)模型、智能驾驶模型(IDM)以及最新被提出的S-shaped three-parameters(S3)跟驰模型进行模型标定以及误差分析,利用加速度、前后车速度差、前后车位置差和后车速度等数据作为输入参数,采用互相关分析与模拟退火相结合的方法进行数据拟合,并利用加速度、速度和位移的均方根误差(RMSE)对参数拟合后的模型进行性能评价。研究结果表明:针对3个不同国家数据集中的跟驰行为,S3微观模型标定效果均表现最佳,3个数据集的RMSE平均值均最小,且低于其他2种跟驰模型; 德国HighD数据集总采集精度高、数据量大,因此无论采用何种CF模型进行标定,该数据集在跟驰行为标定方面的性能均表现最佳、误差最小。研究结果对交通仿真软件模拟交通流的车辆跟驰模型选取及其参数优化具有重要意义,且对于如何选择跟驰模型标定数据集亦具有重要价值。
Abstract:
In order to describe the car-following(CF)behavior of vehicles more accurately, and to study the influence of car-following behavior data from different countries on the calibration of car-following models, as well as the accuracy of various car-following models in simulating car-following behavior, three datasets was selected as a traffic flow dataset from CHD dataset from a section of the South Second Ring Road in Xi'an, China, the U.S. NGSIM dataset, and the German HighD dataset. The Gazis-Herman-Rothery(GHR)model, the intelligent driver model(IDM), and the newly proposed S-shaped three-parameters car-following model(S3)were used for model calibration and error analysis. Acceleration, speed difference between the leading and following vehicles, position difference between the leading and following vehicles, and the speed of the following vehicle were used as input parameters. A combination of cross-correlation analysis and simulated annealing methods were employed for data fitting. The performance of the fitted models was evaluated using the root mean square error(RMSE)of acceleration, speed and displacement. The results show that for the car-following behavior in the three different countries' datasets, the S3 microscopic model shows the best calibration performance, with the lowest average RMSE for all three datasets compared to the other two car-following models. Due to the high overall data collection accuracy and large data volume of the German HighD dataset, it exhibits the best performance and lowest error in car-following behavior calibration, regardless of the car-following model used. The research results are of great significance for the selection of car-following models and parameter optimization in traffic simulation software, and hold important value for the choice of datasets for car-following model calibration.4 tabs, 10 figs, 30 refs.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王殿海,金 盛.车辆跟驰行为建模的回顾与展望[J].中国公路学报,2021,25(1):115-127.
WANG Dian-hai,JIN Sheng.Review and outlook of modeling of carfollowing behavior[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2021,25(1):115-127.
[2]CHENG Q,LIU Z,LIN Y,et al.An S-shaped three-parameter(S3)traffic stream model with consistent car following relationship[J].Transportation Research Part B,2021,153:246-271.
[3]BRACKSTONE M,MCDONALD M.Car-following:A historical review[J].Transportation Research Part F,1999,2(4):181-196.
[4]BROCKFELD E,KÜHNE R D,SKABARDONIS A,et al.Toward benchmarking of microscopic traffic flow models[J].Transportation Research Record,2003(1852):124-129.
[5]CARLOS F.DAGANZO.San Pablo Dam Road data[EB/OL].(1997-11-20)[2022-08-19].http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/～daganzo/.
[6]OLSTAM J J,TAPANI A.Comparison of car-following models[M].Linköping:Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute,2004.
[7]KESTING A,TREIBER M.Calibrating car-following models by using trajectory data methodological study[J].Transportation Research Record,2008(2088):148-156.
[8]POURABDOLLAH M,BJÄRKVIK E,FÜRER F,et al.Calibration and evaluation of car following models using real-world driving data[C]//IEEE.Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITSC).New York:IEEE,2018:1-6.
[9]OSSEN S,HOOGENDOORN S P.Car-following behavior analysis from microscopic trajectory data[J].Transportation Research Record,2005(1934):13-21.
[10]陆斯文,王俊骅.基于ANFIS的高速公路车辆跟驰模型与仿真[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(7):1018-1022.
LU Si-wen,WANG Jun-hua.Freeway car-following model and simulation based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2010,38(7):1018-1022.
[11]TANG T Q,LI J G,HUANG H J,et al.A car-following model with real-time road conditions and numerical tests[J].Measurement,2014,48:63-76.
[12]郭海锋,袁鑫良,徐东伟.车辆跟驰模型参数标定中的性能指标选择[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(1):103-110.
GUO Hai-feng,YUAN Xin-liang,XU Dong-wei.Selection of measures of performance on calibrating parameters in car following models[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2017,30(1):103-110.
[13]王雪松,朱美新.基于自然驾驶数据的中国驾驶人城市快速路跟驰模型标定与验证[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(9):129-137.
WANG Xue-song,ZHU Mei-xin.Calibrating and validating car-following models on urban expressways for Chinese drivers using naturalistic driving data[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2018,31(9):129-137.
[14]王雪松,孙 平,张晓春,等.基于自然驾驶数据的高速公路跟驰模型参数标定[J].中国公路学报,2020,33(5):132-142.
WANG Xue-song,SUN Ping,ZHANG Xiao-chun,et al.Calibrating car-following models on freeway based on naturalistic driving data[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2020,33(5):132-142.
[15]杨龙海,王 晖,李 帅,等.改进分子动力学的车辆跟驰模型[J].重庆大学学报,2021,44(7):26-33.
YANG Long-hai,WANG Hui,LI Shuai,et al.Car-following model with improved molecular dynamics[J].Journal of Chongqing University,2021,44(7):26-33.
[16]U.S.Department of Transportation.NGSIM-next generation simulation[EB/OL].(2005-01-13)[2022-08-19].https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/its/06135/index.cfm.
[17]CHEN C Y,LI L,HU J M,et al.Calibration of MITSIM and IDM car-following model based on NGSIM trajectory datasets[C]//IEEE.Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.New York:IEEE,2010:48-53.
[18]YANG H,GAN Q J,JIN W.Calibration of a family of car-following models with retarded linear regression methods[R].Washington DC:Transportation Research Board,2011.
[19]LI L,CHEN X M,ZHANG L.A global optimization algorithm for trajectory data based car-following model calibration[J].Transportation Research Part C,2016,68:311-332.
[20]KRAJEWSKI R,BOCK J,KLOEKER L,et al.The highD dataset:A drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on German highways for validation of highly automated driving systems[C]//IEEE.Proceedings of 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITSC).New York:IEEE,2018:2118-2125.
[21]SORIA I,ELEFTERIADOU L,KONDYLI A.Assessment of car-following models by driver type and under different traffic,weather conditions using data from an instrumented vehicle[J].Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory,2014,40:208-220.
[22]SCHNEIDER P,BUTZ M,HEINZEMANN C,et al.Scenario-based threat metric evaluation based on the HighD dataset[C]//IEEE.Proceedings of 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium(Ⅳ).New York:IEEE,2021:213-218.
[23]KURTC V.Studying car-following dynamics on the basis of the HighD dataset[J].Transportation Research Record,2020(2674):813-822.
[24]李林波,李瑞杰,邹亚杰.考虑驾驶员模糊感知的深度学习跟驰模型[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(3):360-369.
LI Lin-bo,LI Rui-jie,ZOU Ya-jie.Modeling of car-following behaviors considering driver's fuzzy perception using deep learning[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2021,49(3):360-369.
[25]刘张琦,谢耀华,李宝路,等.基于多国实测数据下的交通流模型对比研究[J].公路交通技术,2022,38(2):134-138.
LIU Zhang-qi,XIE Yao-hua,LI Bao-lu,et al.Contrastive research of traffic flow model based on multinational empirical data[J].Technology of Highway and Transport,2022,38(2):134-138.
[26]QIN Y Y,WANG H,NI D H.Lighthill-Whitham-Richards model for traffic flow mixed with cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles[J].Transportation Science,2021,55(4):883-907.
[27]王殿海.交通流理论[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.
WANG Dian-hai.Traffic flow theory[M].Beijing:China Communications Press,2003.
[28]GAZIS D,HERMAN R,ROTHERY R W.Nonlinear follow the leader models of traffic flow[J].Operations Research,1961,9(4):545-567.
[29]朱晓东,王文璇,闫梦如,等.基于自然轨迹考虑车型的多车道公路交通指标分析[J].公路,2022,67(2):346-359.
ZHU Xiao-dong,WANG Wen-xuan,YAN Meng-ru,et al.Analysis of traffic indicators on multi-lane highway considering car-truck interaction based on naturalistic trajectory[J].Highway,2022,67(2):346-359.
[30]CIUFFO B,PUNZO V.Verification of traffic microsimulation model calibration procedures:Analysis of goodness-of-fit measures[C]//Transportation Research Board.Proceeding of the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.Washington DC:Transportation Research Board,2010:1-20.

相似文献/References:

[1]王建伟,李娉,高洁,等.中国交通运输碳减排区域划分[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[2]李曙光,周庆华.具有破坏排队的离散时间动态网络装载算法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[3]凌海兰,郗恩崇.基于随机波动条件的公交客运量预测模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[4]田娥,肖庆,陆小佳,等.安全驾驶的横向安全预警报警阈值的确定[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[5]侯贻栋,赵炜华,魏 朗,等.驾驶人空间距离判识规律心理学分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):86.
　HOU Yi-dong,ZHAO Wei-hua,WEI Lang,et al.Analysis on psychology in cognitive distance about drivers[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):86.
[6]赵跃峰,张生瑞,魏 华.隧道群路段运行速度特性分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):67.
　ZHAO Yue-feng,ZHANG Sheng-rui,WEI hua.Operating speed characteristics of tunnel group section[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):67.
[7]林 杉,许宏科,刘占文.一种高速公路隧道交通流元胞自动机模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):73.
　LIN Shan,XU Hong-ke,LIU Zhan-wen.One cellular automaton traffic flow model for expressway tunnel[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):73.
[8]刘俊德,徐 兵,梁永东,等.交通事故下高速公路行车安全评估[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):78.
　LIU Jun-de,XU bing,LIANG Yong-dong,et al.Traffic safety assessment of expressway in the accident[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):78.
[9]芮海田,吴群琪,赵跃峰,等.公路建设对区域经济发展的影响分析——以陕西省为例[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):83.
　RUI Hai-tian,WU Qun-qi,ZHAO Yue-feng,et al.Influence of highway construction on regional economy development——taking Shaanxi as an example[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):83.
[10]彭 辉,续宗芳,韩永启,等.城市群城际运输结构配置客流分担率模型[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(02):91.
　PENG Hui,XU Zong-fang,HAN Yong-qi,et al.Sharing ratios model of passenger flows in intercity transportation structure configuration among urban agglomeration[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(2):91.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-06-21
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFB1600101); 国家自然科学基金项目(61973045); 陕西省自然科学杰出青年基金项目(2023-JC-JQ-45); 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划青年项目(2023-JC-QN-0667)
作者简介:徐志刚(1979-),男,湖北鄂州人,教授,博士研究生导师,E-mail:xuzhigang@chd.edu.cn。
通讯作者:秦孔建(1979-),男,湖北枣阳人,教授级高级工程师,工学博士,E-m
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-01