[1]马天忠,安子申,周 勇,等.拉力型锚杆合理锚固长度分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2022,42(5):43-51.[doi:10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2022.05.005]
　MA Tian-zhong,AN Zi-shen,ZHOU Yong,et al.Analysis on reasonable anchor length of tensile anchor[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2022,42(5):43-51.[doi:10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2022.05.005]
点击复制

拉力型锚杆合理锚固长度分析()
分享到：

长安大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第42卷
期数:
2022年5期
页码:
43-51
栏目:
道路工程
出版日期:
2022-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on reasonable anchor length of tensile anchor
文章编号:
1671-8879(2022)05-0043-09
作者:
马天忠1; 2; 3; 安子申1; 2; 3; 周 勇1; 王正振1; 2; 3; 苏天涛1; 2; 3; 高 虹1; 2; 3
(1. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050; 2. 兰州理工大学 甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730050; 3. 兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730050)
Author(s):
MA Tian-zhong1; 2; 3;  AN Zi-shen1; 2; 3;  ZHOU Yong1;  WANG Zheng-zhen1; 2; 3;  SU Tian-tao1; 2; 3;  GAO Hong1; 2; 3
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China; 3. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China)
关键词:
道路工程;  边坡工程;  锚固系统;  锚固长度;  锚杆倾角;  杆体直径
Keywords:
road engineering;  slope engineering;  anchoring system;  anchoring length;  anchor rod inclination;  rod diameter
分类号:
U417.116
DOI:
10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2022.05.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对锚固系统的主要结构往往埋置于岩体内部,现有关于锚固段长度的计算公式过于繁琐,且岩土工程从业人员多采用经验法进行设计和施工的问题,采用理论推导与实际工程相结合的方法,从锚杆微元体的受力分析入手,给出锚固段微元体受力平衡方程,得到锚杆极限抗拔承载力的计算公式,并以此为基础推导出改进后的锚杆合理锚固长度计算公式。结合现行规范,给出拉力型锚杆合理锚固长度的有效变化范围; 通过改变锚杆入射角的大小,结合锚杆内力几何关系分布图,推导得出锚杆倾角变化后的锚固段长度计算修正方法。探究锚杆杆体直径的变化规律,给出其合理的变化范围,并基于兰州市某实际边坡工程,验证该公式计算的锚固段合理锚固长度取值范围的合理性。研究结果表明:在同一支护结构中,入射角大的锚杆通常其锚固长度也有所增大,验证了提出的锚杆倾角变化后锚固段长度计算修正方法的合理性; 得出影响锚杆抗拔能力的因素主要有界面抗剪强度参数、锚固段长度、钻孔直径等,但必须在一定范围内提高其数值,才可以有效提升支护体系的支护能力。
Abstract:
Aiming at the main structure of the anchoring system was often embedded in the rock mass, and the existing calculation formula for the length of the anchoring section is too complicated, and the geotechnical engineering practitioners mostly use the empirical method for design and construction. The method of combining theoretical derivation and practical engineering was adopted and started with the force analysis of the anchor rod micro-element. The force balance equation of the micro-element of the anchoring section was given and the formula of the ultimate pull-out bearing capacity of the anchor was obtained. Based on this, the improved formula for calculating the reasonable anchorage length of the bolt was derived. Combined with the current specification, the effective variation range of the reasonable anchoring length of the tension anchor was given. By changing the size of the incident angle of the bolt, the geometric relationship distribution diagram of the internal force of the bolt was combined. After deducing the change of the inclination angle of the anchor rod, the correction method of the length calculation of the anchoring section was obtained. After exploring the variation law of the diameter of the bolt body, the reasonable variation range was given. And based on an actual slope project in Lanzhou City, the rationality of the reasonable anchorage length range of the anchorage section calculated by this formula was verified. The results show that in the same supporting structure, the anchoring length of the anchor rod with a large incident angle is usually increased, which verifies the rationality of the proposed anchoring length correction method after the anchor rod inclination angle changes. It is concluded that the main factors affecting the pullout resistance of the bolt are the interface shear strength parameters, the length of the anchoring section, the diameter of the borehole, etc., but the values must be increased within a certain range to effectively improve the supporting capacity of the supporting system.3 tabs, 8 figs, 21 refs.

参考文献/References:

[1] 程良奎,张培文,王 帆.岩土锚固工程的若干力学概念问题[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(4):668-682.
CHENG Liang-kui,ZHANG Pei-wen,WANG Fan.Several mechanical conceptions for anchored structures in rock and soil[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2015,34(4):668-682.
[2]KAISER P K,CAI M.Design of rock support system under rockburst condition[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2012,4(3):215-227.
[3]AKISANYA A R,IVANOVIC A.Debonding along the fixed anchor length of a ground anchorage[J].Engineering Structures,2014,74:23-31.
[4]XU S,HOU P,CAI M.An experiment study on a novel self-swelling anchorage bolt[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2019,52(11):4855-4862.
[5]WU Q,CHEN L,SHEN B,et al.Experimental investigation on rockbolt performance under the tension load[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2019,52(1):4605-4618.
[6]ZOU J F,ZHANG P H.Analytical model of fully grouted bolts in pull-out tests and in situ rock masses[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2019,113:278-294.
[7]MARTIN L B,TIJANI M,HADJ-HASSEN F,et al.Assessment of the bolt-grout interface behavior of fully grouted rock bolts from laboratory experiments under axial loads[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2013,63:50-61.
[8]LI C C,STJERN G,MYRVANG A.A review on the performance of conventional and energy-absorbing rockbolts[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering.2014,6(4):315-327.
[9]FENG B,WANG X,WU Z.Evaluation and prediction of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer cable anchorage for large capacity[J].Advances in Structural Engineering,2019,22(8):1952-1964.
[10]HOBST L,ZAJIC J.Anchoring in rock and soil[M].New York:Elsevier,1983.
[11]周 辉,徐荣超,张传庆,等.预应力锚杆内锚固段长度效应研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(9):2688-2694.
ZHOU Hui,XU Rong-chao,ZHANG Chuan-qing,et al.Study on length effect of anchorage section in prestressed anchor[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(9):2688-2694.
[12]张友葩,高永涛,吴顺川.预应力锚杆锚固段长度的研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,12(6):980-986.
ZHANG You-pa,GAO Yong-tao,WU Shun-chuan.Study on the length of anchoring section of prestressed anchor[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering.2005,12(6):980-986.
[13]EHSANI M,SAADATMANESH H,TAO S.Design recommendations for bond of GFRP rebars to concrete[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1996,122(3):247-254.
[14]COSENZA E,MANFREDI G.development length of FRP straight rears[J].Composites Part B:Engineering,2002,33(7):493-504.
[15]RICHARD G,HRISTOPHE A,SIMON R.Experimental and numerical analysis of in situ pull-out tests on rock bolts in claystones[J].European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering,2019,25:1-24.
[16]THENEVIN I,BLANCO-MARTIN L,HADJ-HASSEN F,et al.Laboratory pull-out tests on fully grouted rock bolts and cable bolts:Results and lessons learned[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2017,9(5):843-855.
[17]程良奎,李象范.岩土锚固土钉喷射混凝土原理设计与应用[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
CHENG Liang-kui,LI Xiang-fan.Principle design and application of shotcrete with rock and soil anchorage [M].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,2008.
[18]黄明华,李嘉成,赵明华.岩体离层作用下锚杆受力特性全历程分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(9):2177-2184.
HUANG Ming-hua,LI Jia-cheng,ZHAO Ming-hua.Full-course analysis of the force characteristics of bolts under the action of rock mass separation[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2017,36(9):2177-2184.
[19]冯申铎,付文光,李鑫权.深基坑预应力锚杆合理锚固长度的研讨[J].岩土工程学报,2008,30(增1):192-197.
FENG Shen-duo,FU Wen-guang,LI Xin-quan.Discussion on reasonable anchoring length of prestressed anchor in deep foundation pit[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2008,30(S1):192-197.
[20]张 雄,陈胜宏.预应力锚索锚固段荷载传递解析算法[J].岩土力学,2015,36(6):1667-1675.
ZHANG Xiong,CHEN Sheng-hong.Analytical algorithm for load transfer in anchor section of prestressed anchor cable[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(6):1667-1675.
[21]李怀珍,李学华.基于界面滑移脱黏的锚杆合理锚固长度研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(11):3106-3112,3172.
LI Huai-zhen,LI Xue-hua.Study on reasonable anchoring length of bolt based on interface slip and debonding[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2017,38(11):3106-3112,3172.

相似文献/References:

[1]武建民,祝伟,马士让,等.应用加权密切值法评价基质沥青抗老化性能[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[2]张宜洛,袁中山.SMA混合料结构参数的影响因素[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[3]陈璟,袁万杰,郝培文,等.微观指标对沥青热稳定性能的影响[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[4]周兴业,刘小滔,王旭东,等.基于轴载谱的沥青路面累计当量轴次换算[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[5]李祖仲,王伯禹,陈拴发,等.轴载对复合式路面应力吸收层荷载应力的影响[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[6]关博文,刘开平,陈拴发,等.水镁石纤维路面混凝土路用性能[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[7]翁效林,王玮,张留俊,等.拓宽路基荷载下管桩复合地基沉降变形模式[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[8]穆柯,王选仓,柳志军,等.基于非饱和渗流原理的路基含水率预估[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[9]李振霞,陈渊召.不同类型半刚性基层材料性能的试验与分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[10]马 骉,马 晋,周宇鹏.沥青混合料降温收缩断裂特性[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):1.
　MA Biao,MA Jin,ZHOU Yu-peng.Cooling shrinkage fracture characteristic of asphalt mixture[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(5):1.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(52068048); 甘肃省自然科学基金项目(21JR11RM052,1308RJZA140); 甘肃省住房和城乡建设厅建设科技项目(JK2022-03)
作者简介:马天忠(1979-),男,甘肃靖远人,副教授,工学博士,E-mail:matz0914@163.com。 通讯作者:苏天涛(1989-),男,甘肃兰州人,工学博士研究生,E-mail:sutt5008@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-30