[1]孙 昊,刘永健,孙明钰,等.大跨装配式应急公路钢桥方案设计与模糊层次比选[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(02):55-63.
　SUN Hao,LIU Yong-jian,SUN Ming-yu,et al.Comparison and selection of scheme design and fuzzy hierarchy for large-span fabricated emergency highway steel bridge[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2017,37(02):55-63.
点击复制

大跨装配式应急公路钢桥方案设计与模糊层次比选()
分享到：

长安大学学报（自然科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第37卷
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
55-63
栏目:
桥梁与隧道工程
出版日期:
2017-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison and selection of scheme design and fuzzy hierarchy for large-span fabricated emergency highway steel bridge
作者:
孙 昊; 刘永健; 孙明钰; 邱洁霖; 张 凯
长安大学 公路学院，陕西 西安 710064
Author(s):
SUN Hao;  LIU Yong-jian;  SUN Ming-yu;  QIU Jie-lin;  ZHANG Kai
School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
桥梁工程; 设计方案; 模糊评判; 层次分析; 装配式公路钢桥; 矩形钢管截面; 优选
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  design scheme;  fuzzy appraisal;  analytic hierarchy;  fabricated highway steel bridge;  rectangular steel tube section;  optimum selection
分类号:
U448.36
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
装配式公路钢桥在战时抢修、抗震救灾中桥梁修复与加固等应急工程中发挥了重要作用，但现有装配式公路钢桥最大理论跨越能力只有69 m，导致部分交通要道的大跨度桥梁短时期无法修复，造成了巨大的经济效益和社会效益损失。为满足大跨度桥梁应急抢修的要求，以单跨90 m装配式公路钢桥为研究对象，提出采用抗弯和抗扭性能较好的矩形钢管截面作为桁架构件的主要截面以提高结构的跨越能力，在继承原有研究成果的基础上设计了“321”型、“200”型矩形钢管桁架方案，创新性地设计了“600”型矩形钢管桁架方案和三角形桁架方案。在有限元建模分析的基础上，详细分析了4种设计结构方案在移动荷载作用下的最大位移、组合应力、用钢量及1阶稳定屈曲系数这4个关键指标各自的优劣。为了方便桥梁设计方案的比选，以桥梁设计的基本目标作为评价设计方案的影响因素，利用模糊数学和层次分析法分解评判指标体系，建立了运用二级模糊综合评价决策方法进行设计方案优选比较的指标体系和方法。最后，结合单跨90 m装配式公路钢桥的4种设计方案，给出了模糊层次分析评价和设计方案优选的具体过程。研究结果表明：“600”型矩形钢管桁架方案所对应的判断结果矩阵中的元素值最大，说明该设计方案在力学性能、经济合理性、技术可行性、施工方便性等方面优势明显，为4个设计方案中的最优方案。研究成果可为后续大跨装配式公路钢桥的研制方案提供设计思路和技术参考。
Abstract:
Fabricated highway steel bridge plays an important role in the emergency projects of bridge repair and reinforcement in wartime rush repair and earthquake relief. But the maximum theoretical spanning capacity of existing fabricated highway steel bridge is only 69 m, which leads to the situation that large-span bridges of some major communication lines can not be repaired in a short period and results in huge economic and social benefits losses. To meet the emergency repair requirements of large-span bridge, a fabricated highway steel bridge with single span of 90 m was investigated. In order to improve spanning capacity of the structure, rectangular steel tube section with good flexural behavior and torsional property was adopted as the main section of the truss members. On the basis of the former research results, the “321” and “200” type rectangular steel tube truss schemes were designed, and then “600” rectangular steel tube truss scheme and the triangular truss scheme were innovatively designed. Based on finite element analysis, respective advantages and disadvantages of four key indexes, such as the maximum displacement, combination stress, amount of steel and the first order stable buckling coefficient under moving load of the four design schemes were analyzed in detail. In order to facilitate the comparison and selection of bridge design schemes, index systems and methods were established by using two-level fuzzy comprehensive appraisal method to select the optimal design scheme, which took the fundamental objective of bridge design as influence factor to evaluate design scheme and used fuzzy mathematics and analytic hierarchy process decomposition to judge index system. Finally, combined with four design schemes of fabricated highway steel bridge with single span of 90 m, the concrete process of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) evaluation and design scheme optimum selection was given. The results show that element value of “600” rectangular steel truss scheme’ corresponding judgment result matrix is maximal, which means that this scheme has obvious advantages in mechanical performance, economical rationality, technical feasibility and construction convenience, so “600” rectangular steel truss scheme is the optimal among the four design schemes. The research results provide some scheme design ideas and technical reference for subsequent development scheme of large-span fabricated highway steel bridge.

相似文献/References:

[1]李宇,朱晞,杨庆山,等.高墩大跨桥梁结构的脆弱性分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[2]高亮,刘健新,张丹,等.桁架桥主梁三分力系数试验[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[3]刘旭政,王丰平,黄平明,等.斜拉桥各构件校验系数的常值范围[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[4]尚维波,张春宁.高墩刚构桥系梁抗震分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[5]邬晓光,李冀弘,宋伟伟.基于改进响应面法的在役PC桥梁承载力可靠性[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):53.
　WU Xiao-guang,LI Ji-hong,SONG Wei-wei.Reliability of existing PC bridge based on improved response surface method[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(02):53.
[6]石雄伟,袁卓亚,马毓泉,等.钢板-混凝土组合加固预应力混凝土箱梁[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):58.
　SHI Xiong-wei,YUAN Zhuo-ya,MA Yu-quan,et al.Prestressed concrete box girder strengthened with comsposition of steel plate and concrete[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(02):58.
[7]李传习,陶 伟,董创文.斜交墩截面刚度与弯曲正应力[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):63.
　LI Chuan-xi,TAO Wei,DONG Chuang-wen.Sectional stiffness and bending normal stress of oblique pier[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(02):63.
[8]邓继华,邵旭东.带铰平面梁元几何非线性有限元分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):68.
　DENG Ji-hua,SHAO Xu-dong.Geometric nonlinear finite element analysis of plane beam element with hinge[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(02):68.
[9]蒲广宁,赵 煜,宋一凡.减梁增肋法加固空心板桥的力学性能[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):38.
　PU Guang-ning,ZHAO Yu,SONG Yi-fan.Mechanical properties of strengthening hollow slab bridge based on beam-reduction and rib-addition method[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(02):38.
[10]党 栋,贺拴海,周勇军,等.基于车辆统计数据的汽车荷载标准值取值与评估[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):44.
　DANG Dong,HE Shuan-hai,ZHOU Yong-jun,et al.Choosing and assessment for the standard of vehicle load based on vehicle statistical data[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(02):44.
[11]秦建平.桥头台背路堤与桥台设计方案评价[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2008,28(04):47.
　QIN Jian-ping.Evaluation of design schemes for embankment and abutment in bridge head[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2008,28(02):47.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-04-07