[1]冉茂平,周兴林,肖神清,等.路表纹理包络轮廓计算及其对抗滑性能的影响[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2019,39(05):11-19.
 RAN Mao ping,ZHOU Xing lin,XIAO Shen qing,et al.Pavement enveloped texture profile calculation and it‘s impact on pavement skid resistance[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2019,39(05):11-19.
点击复制

路表纹理包络轮廓计算及其对抗滑性能的影响()
分享到:

长安大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第39卷
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
11-19
栏目:
道路工程
出版日期:
2019-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Pavement enveloped texture profile calculation and it‘s impact on pavement skid resistance
作者:
冉茂平周兴林肖神清VIEIRA TiagoSANDBERG Ulf
(1. 武汉科技大学 汽车与交通工程学院,湖北 武汉 430065; 2. 瑞典国家道路与运输研究所,东约特兰 林雪平 58235; 3. 哈尔滨工业大学 交通科学与工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150090)
Author(s):
RAN Maoping ZHOU Xinglin XIAO Shenqing VIEIRA Tiago SANDBERG Ulf
(1. School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430065, Hubei, China; 2. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linkoping 58235, Ostergotland, Sweden; 3. School of Traffic Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, China)
关键词:
道路工程包络轮廓印痕法胎路接触抗滑
Keywords:
road engineering enveloped profile indentor method tireroad interaction skid resistance
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了分析轮胎与路表的接触特性及其对路面抗滑性能的影响,采用路面纹理测量车(road surface tester)获取路表纹理二维轮廓离散数据,运用印痕法模型,利用MATLAB软件计算路表纹理包络轮廓,进一步计算了包络轮廓对应的平均断面深度(mean profile depth,MPD)、宏观纹理表面构造水平指数LMa(macro texture indices calculated with texture level)、粗大纹理表面构造水平指数LMe(mega texture indices calculated with texture level)等纹理指标,并与初始轮廓纹理指标进行对比;最后计算包络轮廓、初始轮廓纹理参数MPD、LMa与路面摩擦因数(longitudinal frictional coefficient,LFC)的相关性系数,分析了路表纹理包络轮廓对路面抗滑性能的影响。研究结果表明:包络轮廓纹理参数与初始轮廓纹理参数相关性良好(判定系数R2>0.85);包络轮廓MPD值较初始轮廓MPD值有明显下降,且初始轮廓MPD值越大,包络轮廓MPD值下降幅度也越大;包络轮廓表面构造水平指数较初始轮廓表面构造水平指数下降,LMa的下降幅度比LMe的下降幅度高10%左右;印痕法参数S取值对包络轮廓纹理参数有较大影响,S值越小,其对应的包络轮廓纹理参数值较初始轮廓纹理参数值下降的幅度越大;此外,包络轮廓纹理参数与摩擦因数的判定系数较初始轮廓纹理参数与摩擦因数的判定系数有较大提升,其中MPD与摩擦因数的判定系数提高了约35%,LMa与摩擦因数的判定系数提高了约23%;印痕法参数S值越小,包络纹理参数与摩擦因数的判定系数越高。该结果可为研究胎路接触特性对路用性能的影响提供参考。
Abstract:
To analyze tireroad contact characteristics and the effect of the contact on pavement skid resistance, the twodimensional discrete data of the road texture profile was measured using the road surface tester, and the enveloped profile was calculated using the indentor method in MATLAB. Based on the enveloped profile, texture parameters such as mean profile depth (MPD), macro texture indices calculated with texture level (LMa), and mega texture indices calculated with texture level (LMe) were calculated, and comparisons were made between these and the original profile. Then, the correlation between the friction value (longitudinal friction coefficient, LFC), and the calculated texture parameters considering the original and enveloped texture profiles were analyzed. The results show that the calculated texture parameters with the enveloped profile have a high correlation with those calculated with the original profile, the determination coefficient R2 is higher than 0.85. The calculated MPD value with the enveloped profile shows a significant decrease, compared to that calculated with the original profile, and the larger the original MPD value, the greater the decrease in the envelope contour MPD value. The calculated texture level indices with the enveloped profile are also reduced when compared to the original. The decline rate of LMa is about 10% higher than LMe. The variable parameter S from the indentor method has a significant impact on the enveloped texture parameters, texture parameters with a smaller S show a higher decline. The determination coefficients between friction value LFC and calculated pavement texture parameters with the enveloped profile improved significantly compared with the original, with an increase of approximately 35% in MPD and 23% in LMa. The research results can provide a reference for studying the effect of tireroad contact characteristics on road performance. 2 tabs, 14 figs, 27 refs.

相似文献/References:

[1]武建民,祝伟,马士让,等.应用加权密切值法评价基质沥青抗老化性能[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[2]张宜洛,袁中山.SMA混合料结构参数的影响因素[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[3]陈璟,袁万杰,郝培文,等.微观指标对沥青热稳定性能的影响[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[4]周兴业,刘小滔,王旭东,等.基于轴载谱的沥青路面累计当量轴次换算[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[5]李祖仲,王伯禹,陈拴发,等.轴载对复合式路面应力吸收层荷载应力的影响[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[6]关博文,刘开平,陈拴发,等.水镁石纤维路面混凝土路用性能[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[7]翁效林,王玮,张留俊,等.拓宽路基荷载下管桩复合地基沉降变形模式[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[8]穆柯,王选仓,柳志军,等.基于非饱和渗流原理的路基含水率预估[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[9]李振霞,陈渊召.不同类型半刚性基层材料性能的试验与分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[10]马 骉,马 晋,周宇鹏.沥青混合料降温收缩断裂特性[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):1.
 MA Biao,MA Jin,ZHOU Yu-peng.Cooling shrinkage fracture characteristic of asphalt mixture[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(05):1.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-16