[1]孙传智,李爱群,缪长青,等.高温后600 MPa级高强钢筋力学性能试验[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(06):89-91.
 SUN Chuan zhi,LI Ai qun,MIAO Chang qing,et al.Mechanical properties of 600 MPa highstrength bars after exposure to high temperatures[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2018,38(06):89-91.
点击复制

高温后600 MPa级高强钢筋力学性能试验()
分享到:

长安大学学报(自然科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
第38卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
89-91
栏目:
桥梁与隧道工程
出版日期:
2018-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Mechanical properties of 600 MPa highstrength bars after exposure to high temperatures
作者:
孙传智李爱群缪长青乔燕董学娥
(1. 宿迁学院 建筑工程学院,江苏 宿迁 223800; 2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210096;3. 北京建筑大学 土木与交通工程学院,北京 100044; 4. 宿迁市住房和城乡建设局,江苏 宿迁 223800)
Author(s):
SUN Chuanzhi LI Aiqun MIAO Changqing QIAO Yan DONG Xue
(1. School of Architecture and Engineering, Suqian College, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu, China; 2. School ofCivil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China; 3. School of Civil andTransportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;4. Suqian Housing and UrbanRural Development Bureau, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu, China)
关键词:
桥梁工程高强钢筋高温后冷却方式内部组织力学性能
Keywords:
bridge engineering highstrength bar after exposure to high temperature cooling method internal tissue mechanical property
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了得到不同加热温度和冷却方式对600 MPa级高强钢筋力学性能的影响规律,首先进行27组600 MPa级高强钢筋高温加热,并采用不同冷却方式进行降温处理,然后进行静力拉伸试验,对断口纵向组织进行了观察,分析不同加热温度和冷却方式对钢筋力学性能参数的影响规律,并与其他等级强度的钢筋进行了比较,最后根据试验数据拟合得到600 MPa级高强钢筋经不同冷却方式后各力学性能参数随加热温度变化的表达公式。研究结果表明:当温度较低时冷却方式对钢筋组织基本没有影响,而加热温度较高时,不同冷却方式对其组织影响较大;当加热温度低于550 ℃时,钢筋力学性能基本没有变化,当加热温度为625 ℃时,屈服强度、极限强度和弹性模量参数有下降的趋势,而断后伸长率基本不变;当加热温度大于775 ℃时,不同冷却方式对其力学性能影响差别较大,特别是采用浸水冷却方式的试件,试件断口无颈缩现象,断面较整齐,应力应变曲线无屈服台阶,屈服强度和极限强度增加较大,〖JP2〗断后伸长率急速降低;在925 ℃时,断后伸长率只有1.7%,具有明显的脆性破坏特征,而采用另外2种冷却方式的试件断后伸长率约为30%,差别较大。
Abstract:
To examine the influence of different heating temperatures and cooling methods on the mechanical properties of 600 MPa highstrength bars, 27 groups of 600 MPa highstrength bars were subjected to the following sequence of experimental treatments. The bars were heated to high temperatures and cooled by different cooling methods. Static tensile tests were performed on the bars, and the longitudinal tissue of the resulting fractures was observed. The results were compared with those from other grades of reinforcement. Based on the experimental data obtained, formulas for estimating the changes in mechanical properties with temperature under different cooling modes were derived. The results show that the cooling mode has no effect on the basic tissue at low temperatures, but the influence of the different cooling methods on the tissue is greater at high temperatures. When the temperature is less than 550 ℃, the mechanical properties of the steel bars remain basically unchanged, and when the temperature is 625 ℃, three parameters (yield strength, limit strength, and elastic modulus) show declining trends, but the elongation rate is basically unchanged. When the temperature is greater than 775 ℃, the different cooling methods significantly affect the mechanical properties, especially when the cooling bar is immersed in water. In particular, the test specimen has no neck shrinkage, the section is relatively neat, and the stressstrain curve has no yield platform. The yield strength and limit strength increase, and the elongation decreases rapidly. When the temperature is 925 ℃, the elongation is only 1.7%, and the damage indicates obvious brittleness. Although the elongation of the specimens exposed to the other two cooling methods is about 30%, the mechanical properties vary substantially. 10 figs, 20 refs.

相似文献/References:

[1]李宇,朱晞,杨庆山,等.高墩大跨桥梁结构的脆弱性分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[2]高亮,刘健新,张丹,等.桁架桥主梁三分力系数试验[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[3]刘旭政,王丰平,黄平明,等.斜拉桥各构件校验系数的常值范围[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[4]尚维波,张春宁.高墩刚构桥系梁抗震分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(01):0.
[5]邬晓光,李冀弘,宋伟伟.基于改进响应面法的在役PC桥梁承载力可靠性[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):53.
 WU Xiao-guang,LI Ji-hong,SONG Wei-wei.Reliability of existing PC bridge based on improved response surface method[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(06):53.
[6]石雄伟,袁卓亚,马毓泉,等.钢板-混凝土组合加固预应力混凝土箱梁[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):58.
 SHI Xiong-wei,YUAN Zhuo-ya,MA Yu-quan,et al.Prestressed concrete box girder strengthened with comsposition of steel plate and concrete[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(06):58.
[7]李传习,陶 伟,董创文.斜交墩截面刚度与弯曲正应力[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):63.
 LI Chuan-xi,TAO Wei,DONG Chuang-wen.Sectional stiffness and bending normal stress of oblique pier[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(06):63.
[8]邓继华,邵旭东.带铰平面梁元几何非线性有限元分析[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(03):68.
 DENG Ji-hua,SHAO Xu-dong.Geometric nonlinear finite element analysis of plane beam element with hinge[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(06):68.
[9]蒲广宁,赵 煜,宋一凡.减梁增肋法加固空心板桥的力学性能[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):38.
 PU Guang-ning,ZHAO Yu,SONG Yi-fan.Mechanical properties of strengthening hollow slab bridge based on beam-reduction and rib-addition method[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(06):38.
[10]党 栋,贺拴海,周勇军,等.基于车辆统计数据的汽车荷载标准值取值与评估[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(06):44.
 DANG Dong,HE Shuan-hai,ZHOU Yong-jun,et al.Choosing and assessment for the standard of vehicle load based on vehicle statistical data[J].Journal of Chang’an University (Natural Science Edition),2012,32(06):44.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-18